纽约 美东 盘前 04:00–09:30 04:00–09:30

X 原帖证据 · 科技股多空观点

跟踪 Eric Jhonsa 的最新研究

只呈现公开原帖与明确出现的股票代码,不把一般讨论自动解释成买卖操作。

等待新帖

已保留历史原帖,当前没有近期入库更新。

按发布时间倒序 · 新加坡时间

$ARM 相关原帖

显示 1 条
  1. 原创
    查看 X 原帖
    A few thoughts about AI infra/semis in the wake of $NVDA’s report and big FY28 guide: 1) Along with valuations, sentiment/positioning look much more favorable than they did a couple months ago. Goldman’s data points to HF gross and net exposures being near 12-month lows and Nasdaq-100 futures short exposure being at multi-year highs; put/call ratios for semis and semi ETFs are often much higher than they were a couple months ago; and some frustrated momo-chasers have even resorted to buying cryptos again :). Just as investors were trying too hard in the spring to rationalize weak price action in tech stocks that were being sold to chase semis, I think investors have been trying too hard lately to rationalize…展开完整原文

    A few thoughts about AI infra/semis in the wake of $NVDA’s report and big FY28 guide: 1) Along with valuations, sentiment/positioning look much more favorable than they did a couple months ago. Goldman’s data points to HF gross and net exposures being near 12-month lows and Nasdaq-100 futures short exposure being at multi-year highs; put/call ratios for semis and semi ETFs are often much higher than they were a couple months ago; and some frustrated momo-chasers have even resorted to buying cryptos again :). Just as investors were trying too hard in the spring to rationalize weak price action in tech stocks that were being sold to chase semis, I think investors have been trying too hard lately to rationalize AI infra price weakness caused by a momo unwind and rotations to former laggards. 2) One thing those expecting AI capex to peak soon might be overlooking is that – judging by commentary/reports from lab execs, research firms, etc. – the frontier labs could be close to delivering LLMs that are much better at handling long-horizon agentic tasks, including possibly for knowledge/enterprise work involving non-verifiable domains and tasks that require high accuracy. There are a lot of rumblings right now about the labs getting close to achieving continual learning and initial forms of RSI (some have argued the latter is already here). And while there are longer-term risks to the capex trade related to continual learning/RSI potentially enabling giant LLM training and inference efficiency gains, in the short-to-medium term they’re likely to drive another inflection in token consumption and ARR. Some of Jensen and Colette’s earnings call commentary – about expected agentic growth and 2027 supply/demand, as well as their prediction that the frontier labs will become the world’s largest tech companies – might have been colored by expectations of such LLM advances. And in the meantime, OpenRouter’s data suggests token consumption is still soaring; GPU pricing remains strong; and offerings such as Copilot, ChatGPT Work and Grok Bot are already driving strong growth in non-coding agentic workloads. 3) I said in June that I’m wary of AI infra plays with valuations that require capex to keep growing strongly beyond 2028 for the stocks to work. But right now, it’s not hard to find names with valuations that are arguably pricing in a 2028 capex decline. Along with memory stocks trading at mid-single-digit forward P/Es, you have everything from $NVDA, $TSM and $AVGO, to high-growth semicap subsystem plays ( $UCTT, $MKSI, $AEIS), to ODMs with big exposure to GPU and custom ASIC programs ( $CLS, $FLEX, $SANM), to data center industrials and BTM power plays with large backlogs ( $MOD, $FTAI, $BW, $GNRC), sporting 2027E EPS multiples that are in the teens (sometimes low teens). Not to mention a lot of foreign-traded AI infra plays that also look pretty inexpensive. There are still some richly-valued AI infra plays out there (e.g. $ARM, $CIEN, a few semicaps and industrials). And higher long yields and a tougher credit environment are risk factors for neoclouds and data center leasing firms with big 2027/2028 capital-raising needs. But unless one expects capex to roll over relatively soon, the risk/reward for a lot of other names seems decent here.